Starfield has been out for about six weeks, and as the dust settles on the honeymoon period, some players are finding that the spacefaring RPG just doesn't have the staying power of Bethesda's previous games, most notably Skyrim.
26.09.2023 - 13:51 / gameranx.com / Todd Howard / Phil Spencer / Howard / Ai
Todd Howard has shared a surprising insight about Starfield.
Todd shared a more recent post mortem of the game when he was interviewed for the AIAS Game Maker’s Notebook Podcast.
This relates to the space combat side of the game. Usually, space combat can be esoteric, especially the more simlike the space combat game can get. There are arcadey 6DOF games, but for the most part, those games also have quite the learning curve to master.
While that can be OK if you’re talking about a game sold to the niche of PC gamers in the 1990s, expectations are greater to provide a more broadly enjoyable experience in the 2020s. And so, Bethesda’s challenge was to provide an experience that could satisfy those older PC players used to ornate systems, while also making it easier to play for newer fans.
In the interview, Todd brought up some other space combat games, and the systems they used in their game design. Faster Than Light had a combat mechanic where the player had to allocate their ship’s engine power towards different systems.
Todd also revealed he, like Phil Spencer, is an old Mechwarrior fans. While Mechwarrior seemed more arcadey than other mech games at the times because of its focus on consoles, Todd admired its slower pace.
Todd explained that the teams was able to combine these elements and more to make a satisfying combat system. In his words:
“That part all worked out quite well, but then you have to mix it in with the AI.”
While higher difficulty is supposed to provide players with more challenge, in this situation, it just made the fighting much longer, and as a result, more tedious. And this is why Bethesda made the call to make the combat enemy AI to be quite obtuse.
Again, quoting Todd verbatim here:
“It’s very easy to make the enemies really, really smart or end up in the situation where you’re forever just jousting. It turns out you have to make the AI really stupid… they should fly, and then they need to turn, basically like, ‘Hey player, why don’t you just shoot me for a while.”
Starfield’s combat systems have been the subject of criticism, but much like Bethesda’s other games, focusing on one or a few of these weak spots is confusing the forest for the trees. If Bethesda lets one aspect of the game falter, it ends up doing so in the service of the game’s greater design. And that’s the way it is here, so that the space combat doesn’t get in the way of the immersion, storytelling, or other elements of Bethesda’s latest AAA release.
Starfield has been out for about six weeks, and as the dust settles on the honeymoon period, some players are finding that the spacefaring RPG just doesn't have the staying power of Bethesda's previous games, most notably Skyrim.
Starfield director Todd Howard has said that Starfield was intentionally made to be played for a long time.
Starfield director and Bethesda’s Todd Howard has talked about how so many triple-A games these days incorporate light RPG elements into their design, and what this meant for how the team approached its newest game.
Bethesda Game Studio’s creative director, Todd Howard, wasn’t expecting our Starfield ships to be so damn cool.
Bethesda boss Todd Howard reckons many games are some sort of RPG nowadays, which is partly why Starfield doubles down on the studio's classical role-playing style to stand out in the crowd.
Starfield director Todd Howard says that Bethesda's sci-fi RPG was «intentionally» designed to be played for a long time and that he expects to still be working to update the game for the next five years.
If there's one thing I love in this world, it's trinkets. Tchotchkes. Doodads and thingamajigs. Nothing enables this desire for collecting crud more than a good old-fashioned Bethesda game. Forks, mugs, spoons, bowls—you name it, it's probably in my inventory.
Bethesda boss Todd Howard says Starfield was designed and built for longevity, even more so than RPGs like Skyrim or any of the modern Fallouts, with the studio already considering how the game will evolve for years and years to come.
If you're tired of Starfield encumbrance, guess what: it's your own fault. Even director Todd Howard will tell you that you should stop picking everything up.
Starfield was extensively playtested by Bethesda devs often working from home, and Todd Howard says this approach worked so well that the studio's going to apply the method to its future games, with the studio's next confirmed, albeit far-off project obviously being The Elder Scrolls 6.
I've walked on nearly 200 different planets in Starfield in environments ranging from frozen tundra to baking infernos to toxic atmospheres. And in all that time I've only suffered one affliction that I felt a need to rush to a doctor to fix: I contracted a lung condition that eventually got so bad it made sprinting consume my oxygen supply in a matter of seconds, and I didn't have the meds to cure it myself.
Bethesda is known for making big, blockbuster RPGs—but Starfield's space combat was a totally new frontier for the team. I've personally found a decent bit of fun in zipping around and knocking pirates out of the sky, even if it's clearly not the game's main focus. I don't envy the devs saddled with the task of balancing dogfights in space.